Tiantian Yang

Tiantian Yang
  • Assistant Professor of Management
  • Assistant Professor of Sociology

Contact Information

  • office Address:

    2025 SH-DH
    3620 Locust Walk
    Philadelphia, PA 19104

Research Interests: Entrepreneurship, Careers, Job Mobility, Organizational Theory, Economic Sociology, Gender and Race

Links: CV, Google Scholar, MGMT/OIDD 293 People Analytics Course Preview

Overview

Tiantian Yang  is a management professor at the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. As a scholar, she studies the strategies individuals use for career advancement, with a particular focus on how they navigate and shape career opportunities—and when they succeed, when they fail, and why. She has published many articles in top management and sociology journals, including American Sociological Review, Organization Science, Strategic Management Journal, Academy of Management Journal, MIS Quarterly, and Journal of Management. She has received two highly prestigious awards based on nominations and recommendations: the Kauffman Dissertation Fellowship in 2012 (15 awarded nationwide) and the Kauffman Junior Faculty Fellowship in 2017 (7 awarded nationwide).

At Wharton, Tiantian teaches Managing Careers and People Analytics. In Managing Careers, she helps students navigate their professional paths as they become managers—students describe this class as providing a valuable roadmap for their careers. In People Analytics, she equips students with data-driven tools to guide their management decisions and appreciate the tremendous value of data for workforce management. She has also received Wharton Teaching Excellence Award in 2022, 2024, and 2025. She was named one of Poets&Quants for Undergrads’ 50 Best Undergraduate Professors for 2025, recognized for excellence in teaching and mentorship.
.

Continue Reading

Research

  • Julia Melin, Tiantian Yang, Sofoklis Goulas (2026), With a Little Help from My (Girl)Friends: Field Evidence on Gender Homophily and Women’s Career Readiness in Remote Environments, Organization Science (forthcoming).

    Description: Accepted

  • Yiftach Yarmar, Tiantian Yang, Marissa King (2026), When Women Stick Together: Network-Based Gender Inequality and Disruptive Events, Academy of Management Journal.

    Abstract: Social networks play a role in exacerbating or ameliorating inequality. The persistence of network-based inequality is well documented. However, the mechanisms that disrupt this unequal access to resources remain poorly understood. This study investigates how structurally disruptive events, such as mergers and acquisitions (M&As), reshape gender homophily and resource sharing in networks. We examine how 59 M&As shape the evolution of 82,064 physicians’ referral and patient-sharing networks. We find that disruptive events enhance women’s access to resources by altering gender-homophily dynamics in formation, and maintenance. Specifically, acquisitions intensify men’s tendency to form ties with other men. In contrast, women are more likely to preserve ties with other women, with all-women dyads exhibiting greater resilience and higher maintenance rates than mixed-gender or all-men dyads. This dynamic results in richer networks for women, shielding them from the adverse effects of organizational disruption. These results highlight contrasting network behaviors following disruption: women winnow their networks, reinforcing stable, trust-based relationships with women, while men widen theirs, forming new distant ties with men. By demonstrating how gendered network dynamics evolve in response to disruptions, this study contributes to scholarship on gender inequality, network resilience, and conditions under which homophilous ties can mitigate disparities.

  • Tiantian Yang, Aleksandra Kacperczyk, Lucia Naldi (2026), Does Entrepreneurship Narrow the Gender Earnings Gap?, Strategic Management Journal (forthcoming).

    Abstract: Research Summary Prior research has examined whether individuals earn greater returns in entrepreneurship than in wage work but has paid little attention to gender differences in these returns. Using Swedish employee–employer data from 1990 to 2020, we compare individuals' earnings before and after they transitioned to entrepreneurship. We find that women founders earn less than men, yet this gap is smaller than in wage employment. Additionally, entrepreneurship yields disproportionately greater returns for (a) high-ability women facing glass ceilings in salaried positions, and (b) women in male-typed industries who encounter greater barriers to advancement in wage work. Together, these findings show that entrepreneurship can enable women to realize greater returns to their human capital, particularly when they face stronger constraints in paid employment. Managerial Summary This study examines whether entrepreneurship widens or narrows the gender earnings gap compared to wage work. Using comprehensive Swedish data that track individuals before and after founding new businesses, we show that, although women founders earn less than men in absolute terms, they experience substantially larger earnings gains than men when moving from wage work to entrepreneurship. This advantage is most pronounced for high-ability women and for women in male-dominated industries, who face stronger barriers to advancement in salaried work. Our findings indicate that entrepreneurship offers women a pathway to realize greater returns to their skills and experience, yielding disproportionately higher earnings compared to remaining in salaried jobs. For organizations, these results highlight how structural constraints in wage employment can push talented women toward entrepreneurship.

    Description: Forthcoming at Strategic Management Journal

  • Tiantian Yang, Ming D. Leung, Jiayi Bao (2025), Approaching or Avoiding: Gender Asymmetry in Reactions to Prior Job Search Experience, Social Forces, 103 (4), pp. 1350-1373.

    Abstract: This paper presents a novel investigation into how supply-side job seeking interacts with demand-side hiring decisions to reproduce occupational gender segregation. The authors theorize that because female job seekers are less confident of their ability in male-typed jobs than their male counterparts, they will be more responsive to cues from employers. Specifically, job application success will encourage female job seekers to approach similar work in the future; employers’ rejections, on the other hand, will be particularly discouraging, leading women to avoid similar work in the future. Analyses of a longitudinal dataset of three million applications for IT and programming jobs from an online freelancing platform support the theory. Past job-seeking experience, either positive or negative, exerted a stronger effect on how women, compared to men, approached or avoided applying to IT and programming. Because failure is the more prevalent outcome, female freelancers stop applying to male-typed jobs quicker than males. In contrast, analyses in the female-typed writing and translation field did not reveal similar gender patterns. Gender asymmetries in response to employers’ hiring decisions reproduce occupational gender segregation by reducing women’s representation in male-typed but not female-typed fields. Implications for research on gender segregation, careers and hiring are discussed.

  • Tiantian Yang and Hyoyoung Lee (2025), Why I Searched Alone: Understanding Mothers’ Hesitation to Seek Network Assistance during Workforce Reentry, Organization Science (forthcoming).

  • Prasanna Tambe and Tiantian Yang (2025), The Hidden Cost of IT Innovation: Access to Emerging Technologies and the Gender Wage Gap, MIS Quarterly, 49 (2), pp. 677-700.

    Abstract: Although an extensive information systems (IS) literature has explored the economic benefits of information technology (IT) investments, how these benefits are distributed between male and female IT workers has not been as closely examined. This paper bridges this gap by addressing two questions: (1) do women and men have similar opportunities to acquire skills related to new IT innovations, and (2) how do these differences affect the gender pay gap? We argue that women are underrepresented in roles that use emerging technologies due to two interrelated processes: demand-side labor market conditions and supply-side job sorting. By analyzing two independent datasets that provide insights into wages, career trajectories, and skill prerequisites for IT roles, we find that women are less likely to apply for jobs requiring expertise with emerging technologies. Such positions often require extended work hours, frequent job mobility, and geographic relocation—which can conflict with the family responsibilities typically assumed by women. Yet, because these positions tend to offer higher wages, women’s underrepresentation in these roles exacerbates the gender pay gap in the IT sector. Our findings stress the importance of creating more flexible job structures and enhancing women’s access to emerging technology roles as critical for achieving gender equity in the IT industry.

  • Tiantian Yang, Jiayi Bao, Tianna Barnes, Ming Leung (Under Review), Looking the part? Professionalism and the Hiring of Black Job Applicants.

    Description: Revise and Resubmit at Administrative Science Quarterly

  • Kylie Hwang and Tiantian Yang (Under Review), Entrepreneurship and the Reconfiguration of Marginalization: An Evaluative Regime Framework.

    Description: Academy of Management Review (under review)

  • Tiantian Yang and Aleksandra Kacperczyk (2024), Minority Entrepreneurship and Alternative Opportunities Inside Established Organizations, Strategic Management Journal, 45 (1), pp. 745-774.

  • Tiantian Yang, Aleksandra Kacperczyk, Lucia Naldi (2024), The Motherhood Wage Penalty and Female Entrepreneurship, Organization Science, 35 (1), pp. 27-51.

    Abstract: The need to resolve work–family conflict has long been considered a central motive for women’s pursuit of entrepreneurship. In this paper, we propose and empirically uncover a novel mechanism driving female entrepreneurship: reduced earnings opportunities in wage employment due to motherhood status. Combining insights from career mobility research and the motherhood penalty literature, we propose that women who become mothers will disproportionately launch a new business to reduce the motherhood penalty they would otherwise incur in wage work due to employer discrimination. We further predict that this tendency to launch a new venture will be more pronounced for women who occupy high-paying or managerial positions, given the higher opportunity cost of staying in wage work and the higher potential payoffs from entrepreneurship that accrue mothers occupying such positions. Using matched employer–employee data from Sweden that distinguish new-venture founding from self-employment, we find support for our arguments. Overall, this study sheds light on the two antecedents of female entrepreneurship and contributes to a more thorough understanding of what motivates women to pursue irregular and atypical careers, such as entrepreneurship.

Teaching

Current Courses (Spring 2026)

  • MGMT2930 - People Analytics

    This course examines the use of data to understand and improve how people are managed in organizations. People really are organizations' most important asset, providing the critical link in converting strategy and capital into value. Yet throughout most of our history, most organizations have relied on long-standing traditions, hear-say, political expedience, prejudice and gut instinct to make decisions about how those people should be managed. Recent years have seen a growing movement to bring more science to how we manage people. In some cases, that means ensuring that whatever practices and approaches we adopt are backed up by solid evidence as to their effectiveness. Often, organizations will seek to go further, analyzing their own data to identify problems and learn what is working and what is not in their own context. This course applies the insights of the people analytics movement to help students become better managers and more critical analysts within their organizations. The course aims to develop students in three specific ways. First, it will provide students with an up-to-the-minute grounding in current evidence about managing people, providing a knowledge base that can ensure that their future management is guided by best practices. Second, we will develop the skills and understanding necessary to be thoughtful, critical consumers of evidence on people management, allowing them to make the most of the analysis available to them as they make people decisions. Third, we will provide guidance and practice in conducting people analytics, preparing students to gather data of their own, and making them more skilled analysts. We will pursue these goals through a mixture of lecture, case discussion, and hands on exploration of a variety of data sets.

    MGMT2930401 ( Syllabus )

    MGMT2930402 ( Syllabus )

  • MGMT9180 - Personnel Economics A

    This is a half-semester PhD course in the Management Department that is also open to any current PhD students at Wharton. The canonical model in economics views an agent as a fully rational, atomistic individual making optimal choices under scarcity. This approach has been very powerful theoretically and empirically to explain and to predict behavior in the workplace. This model has also been enriched to accommodate other phenomena arguably affecting behavior in the workplace like the social context (e.g. peer effects, altruism, or social comparison), non-standard time preferences, loss aversion, and cognitive costs. Incorporating these ideas into the standard model can be accomplished in various ways but the real stress test for these theories is whether they predict behavior more generally (i.e. we don't just use theory to explain one choice but choices more generally) and to generate empirical predictions that can be tested using experiments. In this mini-course we start-off with a tour de force of the fundamental principal-agent model and the various behavioral extensions. The core of the course is, however, not theoretical but a practical course on how to design field experiments to test these ideas.

    MGMT9180002 ( Syllabus )

  • OIDD2930 - People Analytics

    This course examines the use of data to understand and improve how people are managed in organizations. People really are organizations' most important asset, providing the critical link in converting strategy and capital into value. Yet throughout most of our history, most organizations have relied on long-standing traditions, hear-say, political expedience, prejudice and gut instinct to make decisions about how those people should be managed. Recent years have seen a growing movement to bring more science to how we manage people. In some cases, that means ensuring that whatever practices and approaches we adopt are backed up by solid evidence as to their effectiveness. Often, organizations will seek to go further, analyzing their own data to identify problems and learn what is working and what is not in their own context. This course applies the insights of the people analytics movement to help students become better managers and more critical analysts within their organizations. The course aims to develop students in three specific ways. First, it will provide students with an up-to-the-minute grounding in current evidence about managing people, providing a knowledge base that can ensure that their future management is guided by best practices. Second, we will develop the skills and understanding necessary to be thoughtful, critical consumers of evidence on people management, allowing them to make the most of the analysis available to them as they make people decisions. Third, we will provide guidance and practice in conducting people analytics, preparing students to gather data of their own, and making them more skilled analysts. We will pursue these goals through a mixture of lecture, case discussion, and hands on exploration of a variety of data sets.

    OIDD2930401 ( Syllabus )

    OIDD2930402 ( Syllabus )

All Courses

  • MGMT2930 - People Analytics

    This course examines the use of data to understand and improve how people are managed in organizations. People really are organizations' most important asset, providing the critical link in converting strategy and capital into value. Yet throughout most of our history, most organizations have relied on long-standing traditions, hear-say, political expedience, prejudice and gut instinct to make decisions about how those people should be managed. Recent years have seen a growing movement to bring more science to how we manage people. In some cases, that means ensuring that whatever practices and approaches we adopt are backed up by solid evidence as to their effectiveness. Often, organizations will seek to go further, analyzing their own data to identify problems and learn what is working and what is not in their own context. This course applies the insights of the people analytics movement to help students become better managers and more critical analysts within their organizations. The course aims to develop students in three specific ways. First, it will provide students with an up-to-the-minute grounding in current evidence about managing people, providing a knowledge base that can ensure that their future management is guided by best practices. Second, we will develop the skills and understanding necessary to be thoughtful, critical consumers of evidence on people management, allowing them to make the most of the analysis available to them as they make people decisions. Third, we will provide guidance and practice in conducting people analytics, preparing students to gather data of their own, and making them more skilled analysts. We will pursue these goals through a mixture of lecture, case discussion, and hands on exploration of a variety of data sets.

  • MGMT9180 - Personnel Economics A

    This is a half-semester PhD course in the Management Department that is also open to any current PhD students at Wharton. The canonical model in economics views an agent as a fully rational, atomistic individual making optimal choices under scarcity. This approach has been very powerful theoretically and empirically to explain and to predict behavior in the workplace. This model has also been enriched to accommodate other phenomena arguably affecting behavior in the workplace like the social context (e.g. peer effects, altruism, or social comparison), non-standard time preferences, loss aversion, and cognitive costs. Incorporating these ideas into the standard model can be accomplished in various ways but the real stress test for these theories is whether they predict behavior more generally (i.e. we don't just use theory to explain one choice but choices more generally) and to generate empirical predictions that can be tested using experiments. In this mini-course we start-off with a tour de force of the fundamental principal-agent model and the various behavioral extensions. The core of the course is, however, not theoretical but a practical course on how to design field experiments to test these ideas.

  • OIDD2930 - People Analytics

    This course examines the use of data to understand and improve how people are managed in organizations. People really are organizations' most important asset, providing the critical link in converting strategy and capital into value. Yet throughout most of our history, most organizations have relied on long-standing traditions, hear-say, political expedience, prejudice and gut instinct to make decisions about how those people should be managed. Recent years have seen a growing movement to bring more science to how we manage people. In some cases, that means ensuring that whatever practices and approaches we adopt are backed up by solid evidence as to their effectiveness. Often, organizations will seek to go further, analyzing their own data to identify problems and learn what is working and what is not in their own context. This course applies the insights of the people analytics movement to help students become better managers and more critical analysts within their organizations. The course aims to develop students in three specific ways. First, it will provide students with an up-to-the-minute grounding in current evidence about managing people, providing a knowledge base that can ensure that their future management is guided by best practices. Second, we will develop the skills and understanding necessary to be thoughtful, critical consumers of evidence on people management, allowing them to make the most of the analysis available to them as they make people decisions. Third, we will provide guidance and practice in conducting people analytics, preparing students to gather data of their own, and making them more skilled analysts. We will pursue these goals through a mixture of lecture, case discussion, and hands on exploration of a variety of data sets.

Awards and Honors

  • Top 50 Best Undergraduate Business School Professors, Poets & Quants, 2025
  • Wharton Teaching Excellence Award, 2025
  • Wharton Teaching Excellence Award, 2024
  • Wharton Teaching Excellence Award, 2022
  • Penn Undergraduate Research Mentorship (PURM) Award, 2021
  • Stanford Center for Advanced Study in the Behavioral Sciences Summer Institute, 2019
  • Frank H. Kenan Institute of Private Enterprise Research Grant, 2019
  • Kauffman Junior Faculty Fellowship, 2017
  • Arts & Sciences Council Committee Faculty Research Grant, Duke University, 2017
  • Arts & Sciences Council Committee Faculty Research Grant, Duke University, 2015
  • Royster Society of Fellows Dissertation Completion Fellowship Award, 2013
  • Howard W. Odum Award for Excellence, University of North Carolina- Chapel Hill, Department of Sociology, 2013
  • Ewing Marion Kauffman Dissertation Fellowship, 2012

Activity

Latest Research

Julia Melin, Tiantian Yang, Sofoklis Goulas (2026), With a Little Help from My (Girl)Friends: Field Evidence on Gender Homophily and Women’s Career Readiness in Remote Environments, Organization Science (forthcoming).
All Research

In the News

Why Women’s Networks Are Stronger During Crisis | Tiantian Yang

Professor Tiantian Yang explains why women stick together when facing disruption at work.Read More

Knowledge at Wharton - 3/3/2026
All News

Wharton Stories

A historic stone building with green accents is adorned by blossoming cherry trees with white flowers.At Wharton, Three Students of Asian Heritage Found An Abundance of Community

In celebration of Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month, Wharton Stories is showcasing three undergraduate students who found their footing in community here at the School and at Penn; while also sharing some of the resources that Wharton students can utilize in order to help them create, connect, and…

Wharton Stories - 05/08/2023
All Stories