2033 SH-DH
3620 Locust Walk
Philadelphia, PA 19104
Research Interests: technology entrepreneurship, early stage strategy evolution, technological innovation
Links: CV
Jacqueline (Jax) Kirtley studies how strategy and technology evolve in early stage entrepreneurial firms developing revolutionary and disruptive technologies. She uses multi-year longitudinal field studies to examine hard-science startups in energy and cleantech, robotics, and medical devices, the scientists and engineers who found these firms, and the public and private organizations that support them in their earliest days.
Professor Kirtley is a co-organizer of the Wharton Technology and Innovation Conference, a Representative-at-Large for the Knowledge & Innovation IG of the Strategic Management Society, and a mentor for the University of Pennsylvania’s Y-Prize Competition.
Professor Kirtley did her doctoral studies in the Strategy & Innovation Department at Boston University’s Questrom School of Business. She holds a bachelor of science from MIT in Ocean Engineering with a minor in Mechanical Engineering as well as a master of science in Naval Architecture and Marine Engineering, also from MIT. She received an MBA with high honors from Boston University. Prior to entering academia, Professor Kirtley taught science and engineering through live demonstrations at the Museum of Science Boston.
Jacqueline Kirtley (Working), Following the Money: Entrepreneurial Technology Firm Strategy Making for Creation, Survival, and Success.
Abstract: Strategy-making in entrepreneurial technology firms has two connected but distinct goals, success and survival, as decision makers need to both create a firm where previously there was none and arrive at a strategy that will be profitable in the market. Through an 11-year, longitudinal, qualitative, field study of Ohm, a firm developing novel technology with the potential for industry disruption, I examine how decision makers manage these competing goals to create their emerging firm strategy, and how those decisions direct the path of the firm. I found that decision makers held a consistent, long-term strategy vision of what the firm would ultimately become while they enacted and changed their entrepreneurial creation strategy, which targeted survival and set the firm up for future success. I also found that choices made explicitly for survival and the acquisition of resources drove much of that creation strategy. In the case of Ohm, despite achieving multiple rounds of venture capital funding, a high-profile partnership with an industry incumbent, and well-reviewed commercial sales, the firm emerged with revenue from a game changing commercialized technology and an unfundable strategy. This research contributes to entrepreneurial strategy and finance by identifying the two strategies of entrepreneurial firms, uncovering how the regulatory focus of venture investors shifts from promotion to prevention after their initial investment, and how entrepreneurs managing investors’ prevention focus may alter their creation strategy to achieve short term milestones but fail to set the firm up for success.
Jacqueline Kirtley and Siobhan O’Mahony (2020), What is a Pivot? Explaining When and How Entrepreneurial Firms Decide to Make Strategic Change and Pivot, Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3131
Abstract: Most theories of strategic change focus on how large, established firms recognize or fail to recognize the need for strategic change. Little research examines how early stage entrepreneurs decide when and how to change their strategies. With a longitudinal field study of seven entrepreneurial firms developing innovations in energy and cleantech, we examined 93 strategic decisions at risk for change. We found that decision makers chose to change their strategies only after new information conflicted with or expanded their beliefs. Further, a pivot, or strategic reorientation, was not achieved with a single decision, but by incrementally exiting or adding strategy elements over time, accumulating into a pivot. We contribute a grounded definition of what constitutes a pivot and explain when and how entrepreneurial firms pivot.
Jacqueline Kirtley (Working), Patrons not Predators: Resource-Dependence and Power in Entrepreneurial-Established Firm Partnerships for Novel Technology Development.
Abstract: The swimming with sharks literature holds two key assumptions: that entrepreneurial firms are lower power and that their established firm partners are competitors looking to imitate and misappropriate their innovation. However, those assumptions may not be true in partnerships for the development of novel technology innovation. To better understand these relationships, this research examines how power from resource dependence is assessed and managed between entrepreneurial and established firms in relationships for the development of novel technology innovations. Through a longitudinal, qualitative field study of 11 partnerships of three entrepreneurial firms, I found that partners were mutually dependent and their power imbalance was assessed based on speculation about future resource dependence when the innovation is successful and about the future of the entrepreneurial firm. I also found that the entrepreneurial firms rarely followed the defensive recommendations of the swimming with sharks literature, choosing instead to partner fully and quickly for the sake of expeditious, successful development of their technology and their joint future as either acquisition targets or on-going transacting partners.
Fernando Suarez and Jacqueline Kirtley (2012), Dethroning an Established Platform, Sloan Management Review, 53 (4), pp. 35-41.
Building a new firm around technology innovation can mean different choices and challenges for entrepreneurs. The goals and outcomes of technology entrepreneurship vary as much as the innovations that inspire them. MGMT 267 will take you through the questions that entrepreneurs should address as they go from a technology innovation idea to founding and funding a tech startup. The course will appeal to individuals who have a desire to become technology entrepreneurs at some stage of their career, as well as others interested in the startup ecosystem such as investors, early employees, other professional service providers, etc. Through a combination of individual and team work, you will examine what is different when technology is at the core of an entrepreneurial opportunity and how to move a technology-based venture forward.
MGMT2670001 ( Syllabus )
MGMT2670003 ( Syllabus )
Technology Strategy is designed to meet the needs of future managers, entrepreneurs, consultants and investors who must analyze and develop business strategies in technology-based industries. The emphasis is on learning conceptual models and frameworks to help navigate the complexity and dynamism in such industries. This is not a course in new product development or in using technology to improve business processes and offerings. The class will take a perspective of both established and emerging firms competing through technological innovations, and study the key strategic drivers of value creation and appropriation in the context of business ecosystems. Prerequisite: Enrollment in Education Entrepreneurship program.
Technology Strategy is designed to meet the needs of future managers, entrepreneurs, consultants and investors who must analyze and develop business strategies in technology-based industries. The emphasis is on learning conceptual models and frameworks to help navigate the complexity and dynamism in such industries. This is not a course in new product development or in using technology to improve business processes and offerings. The class will take a perspective of both established and emerging firms competing through technological innovations, and study the key strategic drivers of value creation and appropriation in the context of business ecosystems. Prerequisite: Enrollment in Education Entrepreneurship program.
How do you take a good idea and turn it into a successful venture? Whether you plan to become a founder, investor, mentor, partner, or early employee of a startup company, this course will take you through the entire journey of new venture creation and development. MGMT 230 is a project-based survey course designed to provide an overview of the entrepreneurial process and give you practical hands-on experience with new venture development. You and a team will have the chance to ideate, test, and develop a pitch for an early-stage startup by incorporating material from class lectures, simulations, labs, and class discussions. By the end of the course, you will have a better understanding of what it takes to create a successful startup, as well as proven techniques for identifying and testing new market opportunities, acquiring resources, bringing new products and services to market, scaling, and exiting new ventures.
Building a new firm around technology innovation can mean different choices and challenges for entrepreneurs. The goals and outcomes of technology entrepreneurship vary as much as the innovations that inspire them. MGMT 267 will take you through the questions that entrepreneurs should address as they go from a technology innovation idea to founding and funding a tech startup. The course will appeal to individuals who have a desire to become technology entrepreneurs at some stage of their career, as well as others interested in the startup ecosystem such as investors, early employees, other professional service providers, etc. Through a combination of individual and team work, you will examine what is different when technology is at the core of an entrepreneurial opportunity and how to move a technology-based venture forward.
MGMT 801 is the foundation coures in the Entrepeurial Management program. The purpose of this course is to explore the many dimensions of new venture creation and growth. While most of the examples in class will be drawn from new venture formation, the principles also apply to entrepreneurship in corporate settings and to non-profit entrepreneurship. We will be concerned with content and process questions as well as with formulation and implementation issues that relate to conceptualizing, developing, and managing successful new ventures. The emphasis in this course is on applying and synthesizing concepts and techniques from functional areas of strategic management, finance, accounting, managerial economics, marketing, operations management, and organizational behavior in the context of new venture development. The class serves as both a stand alone class and as a preparatory course to those interested in writing and venture implementation (the subject of the semester-long course, MGMT 806). Format: Lectures and case discussions
Student arranges with a faculty member to pursue a research project on a suitable topic. For more information about research and setting up independent studies, visit: https://ppe.sas.upenn.edu/study/curriculum/independent-studies
Wharton Professor Jacqueline Kirtley joins Emily Chang on Bloomberg Technology to discuss the guilty verdict (on three counts) of former CEO and founder of failed blood testing startup Theranos, and whether this will prompt investors to scrutinize their portfolio companies more carefully. (Source: Bloomberg)
A guilty verdict won’t chasten investors, and a not-guilty verdict won’t leave founders feeling free to lie. The tech industry has already learned whatever lessons it’s willing to take.
In this Wharton Scale School Workshop, Professor Jacqueline (Jax) Kirtley and panelists Jeff Fluhr, ENG’96, W’96, General Partner at Craft Ventures, and Andy Friedman, WG’95, Managing Partner at Pin High Capital LLC, and Founder and former CEO of SkinnyPop Popcorn, discuss the thinking behind their own pivot decisions as well as how recent world events have led to choices to change, adapt, or persist.
The Great Resignation is coinciding with record applications for new businesses. Wharton management professor Jacqueline “Jax” Kirtley looks at what this means for the labor market.…Read More
Knowledge at Wharton - 10/25/2021